Site Navigation Page Content

Research

The Wake Forest Journal of Law and Policy co-hosts symposium exploring the repercussions of the First Circuit’s decision in Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products

The Wake Forest Journal of Law and Policy is co-hosting a symposium exploring the repercussions of the First Circuit’s seminal decision in Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products with the Center for Progressive Reform on Thursday, May 17, in Washington, D.C. Continue reading »

Professors Michael Curtis and Shannon Gilreath speak out about potential legal challenges to Amendment One

So North Carolina has a marriage amendment in its constitution. What now?

For starters, the debate isn’t over. Gay-marriage proponents have vowed to use organizational ties forged in the amendment fight to keep their issues in the public eye. They started last week, sending gay couples to county offices to request marriage licenses the couples knew they couldn’t get and to get arrested for refusing to leave.

The protect-marriage crowd is ready to defend the amendment approved Tuesday if need be, supporters said. But it seems more likely they’ll be able to declare victory and move on to other issues. Local pastor Ron Baity, whose Return America group pushed the marriage amendment for years, said last week that there are “many issues on the front burner,” but “I’m not going to tip my hand.”

The handful of local governments that offer health benefits to employees’ domestic partners are sorting out what the amendment means for them. At least one Mecklenburg County commissioner is pushing to end his county’s existing benefit program, The Charlotte Observer reported last week. The city of Charlotte is considering adding same-sex benefits in what could lead to a test case for the new amendment, the newspaper reported.

Read the full story here.

Professor Michael Curtis tells the Fayetteville Observer generally constitutional amendments can’t be unconstitutional

Professor Michael Curtis tells the Fayetteville Observer that generally constitutional amendments can’t be unconstitutional under the constitution they are amending but that the U.S. Supreme Court has the power to overturn the constitutional ban on same-sex unions. Continue reading »

Professor Tanya Marsh participates in ABA ‘Professors’ Corner’ Teleconference on Property Cases

Professor Tanya Marsh will be part of the ABA’s “Professor’s Corner” teleconference a 12:30 EST on Wednesday, May 9, to discuss Roundy’s Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board. Continue reading »

Professor Gregory Parks tells NPR that he doubts the Florida A&M prosecutions will deter the practice of hazing

Charges filed this week against 13 people in connection with a hazing death at Florida A&M University have thrust the hazing culture into the spotlight.

Continue reading »

Professor Suzanne Reynolds tells WRAL that Amendment One reaches too far

After months of rallies, marches and heated debate, North Carolina’s proposed marriage amendment is less than a week away from the ballot box. Continue reading »

Professor Alan Palmiter tells Bloomberg the average broker may be preparing for a world without load funds

Imagine an investment that is guaranteed — at least initially — to lose you money. Such an investment was once quite common and still exists: the front-loaded mutual fund.

Continue reading »

Professor Shannon Gilreath publishes op/ed in Raleigh News and Observer opposing Amendment One

 I do not favor gay marriage. I do not personally believe that gay people should marry in this state or any other. This conviction is based on reasons likely very different from those of Amendment One’s supporters. Nevertheless, I oppose Amendment One.

Continue reading »

Professor Gregory Parks tells USA Today he doesn’t think the Champion case will deter future hazing

In one of the largest hazing prosecutions ever, 13 people were charged Wednesday in the brutal hazing death of Florida A&M University drum major Robert Champion. Continue reading »

Professor Shannon Gilreath argues against adoption of Amendment One

I do not favor gay marriage. I do not personally believe that gay people should marry in this state or any other. Of course, this conviction is based on reasons likely very different from those of Amendment One’s supporters. Continue reading »